Jump to content

Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Design by The Rues LLC

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

2 Newbie

About Design by The Rues LLC

  • Rank

Contact Methods

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Tennessee, USA
  1. OSUBlake/apploud - Is there any headway on this, or is this code available elsewhere? That link is dead.
  2. Ah. Jonathan, that did it. Adding `rotationX:0.01` forced it. Thank you.
  3. Carl - Thanks for the quick response. I am working on an iPad-only project, and, for some reason, the matrix transforms are infinitely faster (even when just used for scale) than the direct use of scale(). I'm not sure why this is, or if this is new to the iOS family, or what, but I wanted to know if there is a way—even on the simplest of animations—to force the use of the matrix3d() css transform instead. I guess I had assumed force3D offered this, but, in the strictest sense, it is, technically using "3d". Thoughts? Frank
  4. Hello! I am trying to figure out why this codepen (included), even though I have told it "force3D: true" in both the set() and to() methods, is not using "matrix3d" for the transform. I can't seem to figure out what the difference is between my codepen and the GreenSock codepen here: https://codepen.io/GreenSock/pen/kingu. Can anyone point me to the difference? Maybe I just keep missing something simple... Thanks, Frank
  5. Diaco - Wait, I just realized that the "triggerLabelEvent" function is no longer firing with the parameter it is supposed to be passed. Instead, "label" is undefined. Not only that, but it appears to fire 6 times in a row at the very beginning, but doesn't fire at all on the button presses. Lastly, the function I had running to create a "-done" label appended at the end of that sequence was commented out, so that events like "red-done" do not fire. All of these are necessary for my application to get correct reporting. When all put together, the order is unpredictable. Are
  6. Diaco - Yes, that did the trick. I'll work this method back into my larger project and let you know if I have any further problems. Thanks! Frank
  7. Hello! I posted once before about a similar problem, and I was able to workaround that problem easily, but this one is a tad different. In the codepen sample I provided, there are 6 color blocks. Each one is animated in its own timeline, and each timeline is then nested in a master timeline. In this master timeline, I set up a pause at the end of each nested timeline, so that playing the timeline only plays one scene (or, in this example, one animation) at a time, then pauses and waits for the user to press "continue". It is also paused at the start, so you must press "continue" to
  8. Carl - Thanks, and thanks for the compliment. This will work perfectly, as it prevents any significant additional workarounds. I always like it when there's a way to do it without a "hack". Haha. Thanks, Frank
  9. I am using TimelineMax to create a sort of comic that the user can step through. At the end of each sequence of animations, I have a label to indicate the completion of a scene, a pause, and a triggerEvent function that lets my application know that we now need user interaction to continue (typically, to display a next button). Unfortunately, when the user clicks the "next" button to continue (which simply calls the play() method of the timeline), the triggerEvent function fires again, because the playhead was paused at that same frame. There are a number of solutions I am considering s