Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 07/22/2017 in Posts

  1. 9 points
    A GSAP tale: One goofy guy’s odyssey from knowing nothing to knowing just enough to confuse himself. (This is crazy long so feel free to jump to the epic conclusion). Greetings fellow GreenSockers. The end of this week marks the one-year anniversary of my first post on the forum so I thought I’d take the opportunity to share my 12-month story and hopefully encourage others to jump into the conversations around here. Maybe you’ll recognize yourself in some of the things I’ve experienced. My quick history in a nutshell Web design and coding is a second career for me. After 15 years of owning and operating a photography studio and processing lab (back in the film days - yup - I’m old), the digital camera came along and changed that industry, which necessitated a new career for me. I shifted to video production, which led to motion graphics and finally to web design. Our little agency now offers all those services. The web design clients never needed anything fancy so JavaScript took a back seat to HTML & CSS only sites for a number of years. JavaScript & GSAP: false starts and other obligations I first discovered GSAP a few years ago, but only tried it briefly. It looked cool, but with the time obligations of field video work and motion graphics jobs, it wasn’t something I could work into the schedule. Besides that, it was JavaScript – too complicated I thought. I knew JavaScript was the third piece of a good web designer’s skillset along with HTML and CSS, but I always convinced myself that I didn’t have the time and the sites we built didn’t need it. JavaScript Books + Classes = Fail I did make a few attempts at reading some JavaScript books and working through some online tutorials, but it just never ‘stuck’. Maybe the examples were too theoretical and dry or they were the wrong books and classes. I really don’t know, but I abandoned the learning process a number of times. Cut and Paste mentality Why did I really need to learn anyway? You can just Google what you need, cut and paste some code and presto – you’ve got some working JavaScript or jQuery. I only understood a small portion of what I was cutting and pasting, but hey… it worked so the problem was solved. That’s how I operated for quite some time. What’s a loop? What’s an array? What’s an object? Who cares? Wait a minute. This is ridiculous. Last spring, I was remodeling our company website and I had all these grand visions about making things move and behave in certain ways. Googling for code just wasn’t cutting it. I suddenly felt stupid. “This is ridiculous!” I thought. I should be able to learn how to write my own code. Oh yeah, I remembered that GreenSock thing I had looked at a few times and abandoned. That might work. Maybe I could actually learn how to use it this time. I become a forum lurker I started lurking in the shadows of the forum. After reading a lot of posts, I saw people asking many types of questions from simple to crazy complicated (at least to me). Two things I noticed were that every effort was made to find an answer (no matter the difficulty level of the question) and not one post was condescending or snarky. That’s quite rare on the ol’ interwebs, isn’t it? Hmmmm…maybe I’m in the right place. Oh boy… time to ask a question of my own One of the great things about learning GSAP is you’ll also pick up a lot of other JavaScript and/or jQuery along the way. I kept reading and practicing with some simple tweens, but now I had a question. Dare I post? I suppose, like many others, I feared looking like an idiot even though the forum members and moderators seemed quite nice and helpful. I do several dumb things every day so you’d think I’d be used to it by now. Oh well, here goes. My first question had to do with the indexOf() a Draggable snap array. Within 30 minutes, Diaco and Rodrigo had posted great answers and neither one called me stupid! Yay – how cool. I get hooked on GSAP and the forum About that same time, I decided our company should discontinue on-site video production and switch to studio only filming. I got tired of lugging loads of video gear in and out of buildings – it’s quite tiring and as I mentioned earlier – I’m old. This freed up some time and I decided to dedicate that time to learning GSAP and maybe, one day, even helping others. It wasn’t too long and I actually knew the answer to a forum question. I posted some information and wow – a little red indicator lit up on my control panel. Someone liked something I wrote. How fun – I’m hooked. Carl makes direct contact I continued to learn and experiment. I posted a few additional questions of my own, but I tried to answer more than I asked. If someone posted a question for which I had no answer, I tried to look it up in the docs and figure it out. Most of the time I was far too slow and Jack, Carl or one of the mods would already have the answer posted before I was done reading the question, but it was an interesting way to learn. I did sneak in a few good answers, which led to a private message from Carl. He thanked me for participating and helping in the forums. I thought it was pretty cool that a super smart guy like Professor Schooff would take the time to do that for little ol’ me. My decision to dedicate time to the platform and forum was reinforced. Blake and I have a conversation I don’t recall if it was a back and forth in a forum post or a private message conversation, but Blake told me something that, of course is obvious, but it stuck with me and is important for all of us to remember. He mentioned that we all enter this learning process knowing nothing. If someone of Blake’s considerable skill level can be humble enough to remember first starting out in code, there may be hope for me after all. I guess if you think about it, there was a time when the simple concept of a variable was brand new to all of us. We’re not born with these abilities. They’re learned and we’re all at different points on the educational path. Never feel stupid for not knowing something. Moderator Promotion Throughout the last year, I’ve continued to learn and study both GSAP and JavaScript. Some of those books I abandoned in the past even make sense now. I’ve tried to be active in the GS community and answer as many forum questions as possible. If I’ve answered a question of yours, I hope you found it somewhat helpful. I’ve cranked out some fun CodePens and finally started a Twitter account to tweet them out. I am nowhere near an expert with GSAP or JavaScript, but I know so much more than I knew a year ago. Apparently I know enough to be entrusted with a forum promotion to Moderator status. I’m honored to be included on such an amazing team. 12 months down – what’s next? My agency duties are still numerous so I can’t dedicate full time to coding, but it remains something to which I’m committed and thoroughly enjoy. I started this 12-month GSAP journey just wanting the ability to write my own code rather than cutting and pasting the work of others. I’m confident I have achieved that, but I still have days when a simple piece of code just won’t coalesce in my brain and that can be frustrating. I guess we all have those days, right? I make several mistakes every day, but that’s o.k. too. I learn a lot more from my screw-ups than I ever do when it all goes right on the first try. I plan to keep learning and getting better and when I get stuck, I’ll be able to get an answer from this amazing community. I’ll continue to give back to the GS community by answering any questions that are within my abilities to do so. The super mods: Jonathan, Blake, Diaco and Rodrigo Thank you to my fellow moderators. You guys rock and have taught me so much. @Jonathan – if there is a browser bug, quirk or special fix that you are not aware of, I’ve yet to read about it. Your knowledge has helped me fix many pieces of code before they even became a problem. Plus, if I ever have a question of top/left vs. x/y, I know who I’ll ask. @Blake – if I could be half as good at coding as you, I’d be a very happy guy. Your work always teaches and inspires me. I don’t think you’re allowed to ever stop posting on the forum or we may all show up on your doorstep and ask questions. @Diaco – your code is always so concise. I deconstruct some of your pens and am astounded by how much you squeeze out of a few lines. If I made some of your pens from scratch, I’d have 20 variables, 5 loops, 12 tweens and 80 lines of code. You do the same with two variables and 4 lines of code. Amazing stuff. @Rodrigo – when searching the forum, I often land on one of your past posts and learn a lot. Your knowledge is vast and I wish you had more time to post around here. Your ninja skills are incredibly strong. Our superhero leaders @Carl – I’ve participated in several online forums ranging from graphic design to 3D to video production, but the GreenSock forum is the best and a big part of that is you. You not only provide great answers, but you do it in clever ways with just the right amount of humor thrown in here and there. The collection of videos you’ve made is invaluable and should be mandatory viewing for anyone interested in GSAP. I’ve seen you monitoring the forums at all hours of the day and even on weekends. When you get any sleep I’ll never know, but I thank you for your dedication and sharing your knowledge. @Jack – how you had the vision to start GreenSock and write the first version of the animation platform I can only imagine. I’m glad you did because GSAP is such an amazing collection of tools. The friendliness of the community is definitely following your lead. I don’t understand a lot of what you talk about sometimes, but I know enough to be amazed by your brilliance and talent. You call yourself just a guy who geeks out about code, but you’re more than that. You’re a smart and generous innovator who’s created a special brand and place on the web. I think I can safely speak for the community when I say we all appreciate the time and effort you put into helping us make beautiful and high-performance animations. Thank you sir. The epic conclusion. Well… maybe just a regular conclusion. If you didn’t read the whole post, I don’t blame you. It’s ridiculously long and I’m just some guy you don’t know so I’ll wrap it up with this bit of advice. Whether you’re a genius or feel like an idiot, it doesn’t matter. Try to learn one new thing each day and before you know it, a year will have passed and all those little bits will add up to new skills and abilities. If you’ve never posted on the forum, please jump in and participate. The more voices we have around here, the more we all benefit. If you need an answer, please don’t be afraid to ask a question. Believe me, I’m just some goofy guy in front of a computer. If I can learn this stuff, so can you. As I begin my second year in GreenSockLand, I’m looking forward to learning more, seeing everyone’s work and answering as many of your questions as I can. This is an amazing community and I encourage anyone reading this to set up an account and get involved. My best to all of my fellow GreenSockers. See you around the forums. - Craig (PointC) PS I made a little CodePen to commemorate my one-year forum anniversary. It’s how I felt before and after discovering the power of GSAP. Enjoy.
  2. 8 points
    Hi alessio, Just use transformOrigin. TweenMax.fromTo('.test', 0.6, {scale: 1}, {scale: 1.1, repeat: -1, repeatDelay:0, yoyo: true, transformOrigin: 'center center'});
  3. 8 points
    That's because when a tween is defined it is rendered immediately to the start position, usually only noticed in the case of 'from tweens'. Because you are using set at the start of timeline, it is behaving same. You can set immediateRender to false on first tween and it will behave as expected. Well and you can use just fromTo tween to same thing. // To tween tl.set(".slide", { opacity: 1, immediateRender: false }); tl.to(".slide", 1, { x: 300, opacity: 0 }); // fromTo tween tl.fromTo(".slide", 1, { opacity: 1, immediateRender: false }, { x: 300, opacity: 0 });
  4. 8 points
    Hello dear friends, No doubt Christmas is coming ... Hi @Jonathan - sorry, when I saw your new portrait, I just felt the need to redecorate my tree to dedicate it to the GreenSock community. I coded my first Christmas tree inspired by the work of Petr Tichy (here) Dec 2015. It was one of my first exercises. Kind regards Mikel
  5. 8 points
    Hi, For last few days I wanted to start making few video tutorials, I got this idea when I was responding to a thread where somebody wanted to recreate simple carousel effect. This is my first tutorial ever, I plan to make more tutorials mostly based on questions that I answer here. If you feel like you can learn from me, feel free to request any tutorials. I will try to do it depending on the topic and if I can solve it myself. Most of my tutorials will be for those who are just getting started with GSAP. Following is the very first tutorial I made today.
  6. 8 points
    I've made a few games using GSAP: Nevergrind - Single-Player RPG Firmament Wars - Realtime Multiplayer Strategy Game I have no regrets using GSAP. It's my favorite tool and as far as I'm concerned it hasn't limited me in any way and I feel very productive with it. I plan to make a 3rd game, a multiplayer co-operative rogue-like follow-up to Nevergrind. Developing games with GSAP is a pure joy. If needed you can even pause the game, as long as you don't use setTimeout or setInterval. As long as every timer and animation is created using GSAP (TweenMax, TimelineMax, TweenMax.delayedCall), you can just do TweenMax.pauseAll() to pause the game (this can be done in Nevergrind by hitting ESC). Since GSAP can tween any object value using any ease, it's simple to Tween using the set method, onUpdate, over time, or whatever kind of animating you need to do. Hope that helps. Discovering GSAP was like finding the holy grail for me because I was seriously using JQuery's .animate before that.
  7. 8 points
    Hi @menschies ! Welcome to the forums! Always remember: With Great Powers, Comes Great Responsibilities. Use them wisely, use them to make things a little bit nicer. A few comments: You can use images instead of inlining the whole SVG if you are not changing the inside of it. The solution to your question is about nesting the separating the elements and nesting them based on your needs. I'm super busy these days but I wouldn't mind lending a hand whenever possible for your landing page - within limits. I can't take any responsibility at the moment.
  8. 8 points
    So you can imagine, it's Saturday night and there's another deadline looming on Monday. I'm just about to settle in to what I reckon is about 2 hours of work animating "a magical trail randomly jumping around the screen". I got some ideas so just need to crack on. Before I do I just check the "ease-visualizer" and low and behold I find "rough", which I'd forgotten about. Give it a go and that's kinda what I needed, 20 mins later I have finished the job. This keeps happening Jack you have thought of everything and now I don't have any work to do so can enjoy my Saturday evening. So inconsiderate, I mean there's nothing good on TV!! Realised I bought TweenMax 8 years ago, people thought I was mad spending that much money on a tween engine (for Flash). I've used TweenMax in every project I've worked on since buying it and can't imaging developing without it. So just a quick thanks and I'm off to get a beer.
  9. 7 points
    Trick here is to append a clone of the first .slide to the end of #slider. Animate through for the count of the slides minus 1 (i.e. ignore the last slide ... that is to say, less than totalSlides minus 1 because we address them with a 0 index) so that as the last slide gets into position, the slider starts back from zero resulting in a fairly seamless loop.
  10. 7 points
    Hi @dgmldr, Please have a look to your CSS .slds-notification { position: relative; width: 20rem; border: 1px solid #ecebea; border-radius: .25rem; box-shadow: 0 2px 3px 0 rgba(0,0,0,.2); transition-duration: .4s; transition-timing-function: ease-in-out; transition-property: margin,max-height,opacity,top; If you try ... .slds-notification { position: relative; width: 20rem; border: 1px solid #ecebea; border-radius: .25rem; box-shadow: 0 2px 3px 0 rgba(0,0,0,.2); /* transition-duration: .4s; */ /* transition-timing-function: ease-in-out; */ /* transition-property: margin,max-height,opacity,top; */ } you will have a clear responsibility for the job - done by GreenSock. Kind regards Mikel
  11. 7 points
    You, my friend, will need to step into the wonderful and mesmerising world of MATHS. Have a look at this channel by Keith Peters, it will teach you tons about calculating physics-like movement. https://www.youtube.com/user/codingmath
  12. 7 points
    Hi @Raistlin That's a nice effect. Are you asking if that website uses GSAP or just how to make something like it in general? As far as I can tell, they're using CSS transitions. This would normally fall outside the scope of GSAP support, but coincidentally I'm in the middle of creating something quite similar for some interactive infographics so I'll show you what I'm doing. I'm using SVGs in my project, but you can do it with some plain old divs too. The secret is setting the origin point for the divs so they go around the circle correctly. That website is using a pretty big parent circle (3000px) so they set the origin point of the divs to the center of that circle (1500px) and then rotate them. The fade at the top and bottom is accomplished with an additional div over the top of everything with a gradient background image that's transparent in the middle. Here's a basic example of what you could do: I'm manually setting the start rotation of each box with a set() tween, but if you had a lot of elements, you could get them to their starting positions with a loop too. To get the infinite part to work, I simply set() the rotation of each box back to the beginning as it drops down out of view. I just use a simple counter to pick which box is set back to the beginning and when the counter reaches 1, I reset it back to 6. Again, the fade-out at the top and bottom is created with a gradient div over the top of everything. There would be other ways to approach this, but this is how I'd do it. Hopefully it gives you a starting point. Happy tweening and good luck with your project.
  13. 7 points
    I think I see what the problem is - GSAP doesn't natively interpolate "vw" or "vh" units (though it likely will when 2.0.0 is released, but that won't be for a few months most likely). It can set() them directly, but interpolating is different. In this case, the inbetween values are converted to px. So here's a solution that gives you the same result but just does the conversion for you at the right time: Is that what you're after?
  14. 7 points
    Hi @ericshew The most noticeable problem is line 19. //Switch this tl.reversed() ? tl.play() : tl.reversed(); //to this tl.reversed() ? tl.play() : tl.reverse(); That should get everything working for you. It can certainly work with playing and reversing the timelines like that, but you'll see some harsh morph jumps when hovering on/off quickly between <li> tags. You could get some smoother morphs with rapid hovering like this: Just my two cents worth. Hopefully that helps. Happy tweening.
  15. 7 points
    Hi @DD77 pls check these out : and the second one: are these what you looking for?
  16. 7 points
    I don't think so. About the only thing a WAAPI timeline has in common with a GSAP timeline is the name. All I can say is that you should give it a test drive. If you like creating CSS animations keyframes, and are familiar with CSS animation terminology and properties, you'll like WAAPI. Now don't get me wrong, I would actually like to see @GreenSock add something like keyframes to GSAP, I've just never asked for it. It would be really helpful for situations that otherwise might require you tween the progress of a timeline with another animation, but I certainly wouldn't want to use keyframes as the basis for all my animations. Weren't you the one that brought up cargo cult programming? As WAAPI becomes more widespread, it's going to be like 2013 all over again. But instead of people saying that CSS animations are better than JS animations, the mantra will be that CSS and WAAPI animations are better than JS animations. Why? Because that's what some performance gurus over at Google said, and they know what they're talking about. And some of the stuff I've read on Twitter and Medium is also pretty convincing. I mean, just look at this comparison. This is what happens when the browser is busy, which apparently happens all the time. The JS animation on the left is all jank, while the WAAPI animation on the right doesn't skip a beat. Amazing! Don't believe me? See for yourself. I spent a lot of time coming up with an algorithm that accurately simulates how a normal site behaves. That demo says all that needs to said. WAAPI is clearly better. No further testing is required. Oh wait... a challenger appears. It's called "Something other than transforms or alpha". Oh how the tables have turned! Turns out that WAAPI is indeed susceptible to jank. Not only that, but the jank can be magnified if the animation gets out of sync, looking like a video game with really bad collision detection, glitching through walls and stuff. So locking the browser up to show how jank affects JavaScript animations is just stupid, and can actually disprove what you're were trying to prove. Besides, if your site really has that much jank, then one or more of the following must be true. You're not a good developer or just starting out. You're scroll jacking the interface. See previous point. You're creating a WordPress site and just discovered themes and plugins. See first point. You're viewing a demo showing how JavaScript animations are affected by jank. You're using IE6 with 40 different custom search bars while running BonziBuddy. So all those demos and articles that talk about the performance benefit of WAAPI are not entirely true. WAAPI only performs better when it's being demonstrated using cherry picked conditions. There are like several hundred different CSS properties that can be animated. To say that you should only animate transforms, alpha, and a couple filters is crazy! That's sounds more like a coding challenge. And what about SVG? Should we just ignore that all together? I think not.
  17. 7 points
  18. 7 points
    Hi all, one mask - two rects - one timeline - the help of use that simple it can be
  19. 7 points
    Results may vary, but <use> elements are not static, so the browser has to track changes across every instance. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8604999/does-reusing-symbols-improve-svg-performance This slide show reveals really poor performance. http://slides.com/rovolutionary/tuning-svg-performance-in-a-production-app#/ Performance issues aside, the real issue when working with the <use> tag is that everything is hidden inside a shadow-root, which you can't access. That might be ok for static icons, but not for animations.
  20. 7 points
    Believe it or not, the trick here is the easing! I did something similar to kind of give a "slot machine" rolling aesthetic to the end of a sentence here What you'd want to focus on is the ease: Elastic.easeInOut.config(8, 0) For your case, "8" might be too much ... so modify that to get the right feel for your project.
  21. 7 points
    Hi @Nineve Use scale instead of zoom. Problem solved. Serializing and deserializing the position and rotation of draggables should be real easy. In that demo, you can loop through the array of draggables like this. draggables.forEach(function(draggable, index) { var target = draggable.target; var transform = target._gsTransform; console.log("Rotation", transform.rotation); console.log("X", transform.x); console.log("Y", transform.y); });
  22. 7 points
    A couple quick things ... you have a lot of variable names/selectors going on ... learnmore $learnMore '#learnMore' First and foremost, your first line needs to be capital `M` in the id `learnMore` because that is how the ID is assigned in the html, and you don't use the # when get an element by id. var learnmore = document.getElementById("learnMore") Then ... use your variable 'learnmore' ... not other misspellings; e.g. $learnMore. Technically you can use the '#learnMore' selector as GSAP has a built selector engine. But, for consistency, I would use the variable that is already created. Lastly, use event listeners to call the functions wrapping each Tween
  23. 7 points
    onCompleteAll is different than onComplete callback. Following is syntax for it.
  24. 7 points
    Hello! I've been meaning to drop a pen here but it took me forever to find some spare time and then another eternity to conceptualize the bits needed for the animation.
  25. 7 points
    Hi @alan0buchanan It really depends on where you look. On this forum, and places like CodePen, you're not gong to find a lot of people using ES6. Look around a place like HTML5 Game Devs, and it's a completely different story. I think most people start using ES6 because of some library/framework they are using. If a person is using React, there's a good chance they are also using ES6 because it's used in all the examples. But I've noticed that a lot of people still live in a jQuery world. The only code they are exposed to is what they see in jQuery's documentation and 10 year old answers on Stackoverflow. So I would have to say that the reason you don't see a lot of ES6 is just plain ignorance. A lot of people have never heard of it, or are misinformed. You'd be surprised by how many times people have asked me how to convert Babel into JavaScript. If you want to see more ES6 examples, people need to be informed, so help spread the word. What is ES6? It's the 6th version of JavaScript, and is also known as ECMAScript 2015. ES5 was the previous version, and came out in 2009. Why should I use it? Because it's JavaScript. There's a lot of new features that can help you write code that is cleaner, smaller, and more concise e.g. arrow functions, string templates, destructuring assignment, computed property names, classes. What is Babel? It's a tool to convert modern JavaScript (ES6) into code that can be used in older browsers. What about performance? There are some new features that haven't been optimized by browsers yet or need a polyfill. This will of course change over time, but if something is too slow, don't use that feature. Most of the features are syntactic sugar, so there should be no difference in performance.
  • Newsletter

    Want to keep up to date with all our latest news and information?

    Sign Up